Religious Rigor Mortis

Sam Rainer

July 24, 2007

On vacation last week, I saw my wife looking at the kayak rental sign in the gas station. When she walked back my way, I knew exactly what was coming.

“Why don’t we rent a kayak while we’re here at the beach?”

“Sure, why not.” I had no idea what we were about to get into.

For those of you who have never been sea-kayaking, it is more difficult than it looks. We originally planned to travel 7 miles one way, then turn around and come back. Needless to say, we didn’t quite reach our goal. About 2 miles into our paddling, all four arms were shot. So we decided to eat lunch on the beach.

Stepping out of the kayak, I could barely move my arms they were so stiff. They were useless, at least for the next hour. I simply had never used them in this manner.

Perhaps the reason thousands of our churches are dying is that the people of the church are suffering from religious rigor mortis. Like my pitiful kayaking arms, they are not exercising one of the most important imperatives of the faith – living as missionaries in their own communities. As a result, they become stiff and useless.

While God will hold the individual responsible for his or her own sins of omission in not following the Great Commission, perhaps one of the more inconspicuous causes of religious rigor mortis in our churches is that of pastor tenure.

Many studies and books cite the significance of leadership in churches. And for considerable change to occur within churches, most pastors will tell you it takes time. Even change at speed of molasses can cause strife within established churches. But pastors are not staying at churches long enough to enact these types of changes. The average pastor tenure is around 7 years in all denominations. The outcry from the church is that pastors do not stay long enough – 87% of active churchgoers within my own denomination state that pastor tenure is too short on average.

Whether it is a change of culture within the church, the curriculum utilized, or the way the church reaches outward (if they do at all), the pastor usually has to earn his chips before attempting serious change.

And if pastors are leaving too soon, then the needed change is unlikely to occur. In short, churches remain in a perpetual state of stagnation. Perhaps this state is one reason too many churches appear as if nothing has changed since the 1950s.

Clearly all the blame cannot be placed upon the short duration of pastor tenure. In the end, we as believers shoulder the burden for our local congregations, regardless of who may be the pastor and for how long.

But a lack of long-term leadership is a major problem with the church’s obedience to the Great Commission. Without a shepherd encouraging the sheep to exercise their calling to share their faith, the church can easily become lackadaisical in spreading the good news. And stiffness can result from a lack of gospel exercise, which can eventually lead to religious rigor mortis.

8 comments on “Religious Rigor Mortis”

  1. Jesusonly says:

    In reading the article on Religious Rigor Mortis, I to agree with the statement that: “Perhaps the reason thousands of our churches are dying is that… the people… are not living as missionaries in their own communities. As a result, they become stiff and useless.”

    I find that this has a lot to do with the “Leadership” of the Church especially the “Pastor.”

    While I agree with the above article’s statement, I find that I must disagree with the other statement that: “perhaps one of the more inconspicuous causes of religious rigor mortis in our churches is that of pastor tenure” and, “The average pastor tenure is around 7 years in all denominations.”

    This statement (all inclusive) is not true as stated because, in the majority of “Pentecostal and Apostolic” churches, the “Pastor” does not leave their Pastoral positions except via “Death” or “Illness” and I have found that because of that denominational setup it might would be better if some of them did leave their positions to allow others to be appointed to the Pastor position because, sometimes “New Pastorship” with new “Vision” and new “Spiritual Insight” coupled with “Fresh Anointing” may
    very well help a Church with “Rigor Mortis” to grow and Thrive
    more successfully because, as it was also stated in the article, “Leadership in Churches is “significant.”

    I have also found in these two denominations, that the “Leadership,” (depending on the age of the Pastor) depends on the “Laymen” to be the ones to “Grow” the church.

    While I also believe as the article stated that, every individual does have a responsibility but, the Word of God tells us that “God has set “Shepherds” over Gods inheritance(people) because the Shepherd is the one who leads God’s people and, he is the one who is suppose to have the Vision for the church because, the Word of God says, “Without a Vision the people perish.”

    If the people can Shepherd themselves then they have no need of a Shepherd(Leader).

    I also agree as the article stated: “Without a shepherd encouraging the sheep to exercise their calling to share their faith, the church can easily become lackadaisical in spreading the good news. And stiffness can result from a lack of gospel exercise, which can eventually lead to religious rigor mortis.”

    As I close with these words from the Word of God:

    “Jesus said in Matthew 23:1-4 – “Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat… For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.”

    Encouragement coupled with Leadership from a Shepherd(Leader) is very important (for most “Sheep”) and with this maybe some Churches won’t suffer from “Rigor Mortis.”

  2. Sam Rainer says:

    Jesusonly – Thanks for your comments. As for your questioning of the 7-year tenure stat, it is derived from Ellison Research, who conducted a large study on pastor tenure. It refers to how long pastors stay at a given church.

    Below is a quote from their methodology section:

    “The study was conducted by Ellison Research, a marketing research company located in Phoenix, Arizona. The sample of 870 Protestant ministers included only those who are actively leading churches. The study’s total sample is accurate to within ±3.2 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level with a 50 percent response distribution.

    The study was conducted in all 50 states, using a representative sample of pastors from all Protestant denominations. Respondents’ geography, church size, and denomination were carefully tracked to ensure appropriate representation and accuracy.”

    Given the above statement, I would have to disagree respectfully with your denial of the veracity of the statistic.

    As for your statement surrounding “new vision.” I agree, somtimes churches need new leadership to help propel them forward. I would hope, however, that these cases are more the exception than the norm. If most of our churches need new pastors to instill new vision, then the church in general is in a sad predicament – there simply won’t be enough “good” pastors to go around.

    In short, I would rather see a culture exist where pastors desire to stay at a church for the long-run instead of church-hopping to the next size up once the slightest bit of turmoil occurs.

    In all honesty, I believe that we see more pastors climbing the ladder of church-size more than we see them going to a church to instill new vision.

  3. kdb1411 says:

    I am familiar with the research of Ellison, and his is some of the best on the church and U.S. Protestantism. I would have to agree with Sam’s response, but I like the spirit of Jesusonly.

  4. Sam Rainer says:

    kdb1411 – great point. If our churches were filled with those having the same spirit of Jesusonly, then our churches would not be in such a state of decline.

  5. I don’t doubt the 7 year average, but my question is why?

  6. Sam Rainer says:

    Shane –

    According to the study, the most common reason for moving from one church to another is a desire to serve in a different type of community or a different region of the US (27%).

    Other reasons are as follows (percentages will not add to 100% due to possible mutliple responses):

    Promotion to a higher position (such as, associate pastor to senior pastor) (20%).

    Desire to go to a larger church (16%).

    Internal transfer by the pastor’s denomination (15%).

    Leaving to start a new church (15%)

    Called by God to leave (12%)

    Better pay/benefits elsewhere (11%)

    Getting fired/forced to resign (10%)

    Switching denominations (9%)

    Desire to pastor a smaller church (4%)

    Church closed or ceased to exist (2%)

    All other reasons (18%)

  7. forthekingdom says:

    The reasons pastors leave churches are sobering . . . and a reminder to me to support and pray for my own pastor.

  8. Sam Rainer says:

    forthekingdom – I know your pastor appreciates your prayers. And I agree, the reasons are sobering.

    As mentioned by Ed Stetzer, too many pastors are eaten up with “community lust and demographic envy.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *